On Fri, 24 May 2002, Philip Charles wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2002, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > Yes, but this does *not* answer my question at all: > > > > kernel-image-* packages do not belong to any task, are any of them more > > popular than tetex-bin? I believe they are not, but the only data I > > have to backup such statement is the popularity-contest data from the > > debian-cd package. If you have more recent data, *please* show it. > > Tex has always been the next task to be included on CD1. So if a consesis > of which of the following images can be moved to a later CD then it will > find its way there. A number of images have already been moved. This > list have some errors. > > [ snipped list of kernel images ]
I wonder why those images have to be in CD #1 at all. The functionality of "being able to boot the system" is well served by whatever kernel is installed by the boot floppies. If you insist that they must go in CD #1, leaving more popular packages in CD #2, we could put the less popular kernel-images in CD#2, one at a time, until TeX fits in CD#1. For this we would need the most recent popularity contest data, the one in debian-cd is quote old (from 2001). Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
