Hi Dirk On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 12:17, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > It is a (very) big package, but it has not grown much lately. Not being able > to build may lead to auto-removal which is bad, excluding an architecture is > also not good. Not clear what the least bad move is here...
I think the thing to do here is file a bug against ftp.debian.org and request removal of the quantlib-python binary package on riscv64. There's no need for a new upload of quantlib-swig with the architectures restricted. This way, users of testing get the new version right away, and should the riscv64 build succeed later, it will automatically become available there too. Regards Graham
