On 5 June 2024 at 21:57, Paul Gevers wrote: | Source: quantlib-swig | Version: 1.33-1 | Severity: serious | Control: close -1 1.34-1 | Tags: sid trixie ftbfs | User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org | Usertags: out-of-sync | | Dear maintainer(s), | | The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing | and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release Critical bug in | testing [1]. Your package src:quantlib-swig has been trying to migrate | for 40 days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug. The version in unstable | failed to build on armel, armhf, i386 and riscv64. | | If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer | period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be | fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on | other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult. | Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or | its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that | hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner. | | This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new | bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed. | | I have immediately closed this bug with the version in unstable, so if | that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect | testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and trixie, so | it doesn't affect (old-)stable. | | If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to | issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
I have seen this, and I am torn. Maybe it is just best to let quantlib-swig die and keep keep just quantlib (the C++ library). Dirk | Paul | | [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg00001.html | [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=quantlib-swig | | x[DELETED ATTACHMENT OpenPGP_signature.asc, application/pgp-signature] -- dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
