On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 21:58:46 +0200 <g...@debian.org> wrote: >> You make me wonder. Would it worth to have packages with different >> quantum depth support in parallel? I mean I would compile / install >> the package twice; first for QD=16 and then QD=32 to different paths >> so I can ship the libraries parallel for any given release. > > Please fix the aforementioned bug as it's blocking the GCC5 transition, and > worry about compiling things twice and providing multiple libraries later. It was just a question for future upstream releases. Life is easier - my slowness is due to IRL things, just got back home recently and need to get up early in the morning. But working on the fix / update and going to upload it soon.
Laszlo/GCS
