On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:59:17 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are: > > ocfs2-tools-1.6.4/mkfs.ocfs2/mkfs.ocfs2.8 > > ocfs2-tools-1.6.4/o2image/o2image.8 > > ocfs2-tools-1.6.4/vendor/common/o2cb.init > > which doesn't exactly match the list of files you added to d/clean :) > The *.8 manpages are present in the original tarball, but just modified > by the build, so I put them in ignore in d/source/options rather than > d/clean. But they could indeed rather have been put in d/clean.
Oh, right. - Yes, d/clean might be cleaner (sic!) if they are re-created during the build. > Anyways, let's just forget about that packaging part, I don't want to > argue. Me neither, just trying to get it right :) > >> > Hm, and what happens if ocfs2console is run with python2.6? > >> I did not consider that possibility, given that the app is run with a > >> #!/usr/bin/python shebang, and that the /usr/bin/python symlink is not > >> managed by an alternative. Am I missing something? > > No, it was me who was missing something (python details still confuse > > me), thanks for the enlightenment! > > And since the package has Depends: ..., python (<< 2.8), python (>= 2.7), > > ... > > we also have a safety net here. > Then if you are convinced that this is the right fix don't hesitate to > go with your own NMU, I cannot upload mine anyways since I'm a DM. > Otherwise if it saves you from some work I am also willing to regenerate > my nmudiff. Yup, I'm happy with the solution; thanks for your offer -- as it's quicker to just remove the patch and upload I've now put the package in DELAYED/2. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Supertramp: Words Unspoken
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
