On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:21:06 +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > >> If no one objects, then I will prepare them for upload. > I've done this now.
Great, thanks for all your work! > I spent the best part of a day scratching my head > over how best to deal with the manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry lintian > warnings for the manpages whose PODs don't correspond to a GLib type, > but I've not come up with anything useful. I guess you are not the first one who didn't find a solution for this issue; these warnings persist since quite some time, despite several people stumbling over them. I looked at the two packages and I'm happy to upload them. There's just one small issue: Maybe you could mention in the changelog not only "new upstream release" but something like "new stable upstream release, we're using a new epoch now because of the unstable ones before, and now we want to track the stable releases ..." (in a complete sentence and proper English :)) -- otherwise this could be a bit confusing. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- BOFH excuse #113: Root nameservers are out of sync
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
