Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > No. It'll belibgal2.4-dev and it provides libgal-2.4.{so,la}
>> >> > But source package name is just 'gal' then libgal-dev
>> >> > (it cames from same source name 'gal') will be removed.
>> >> >
>> >> > If you need old 0.x gal, you can pacakge it as gal0.x
>> >>
>> >> So you're happy if I take the existing package, rename the packages,
>> >> and have it install exactly the same files?
>> >
>> > Yes. Don't forget to change section as 'oldlibs'
>>
>> And explain why I should even need to rename the packages?
>
> source 'gal' will be owned by gal version 2.4.
Yes, but I could produce the same libgal-dev and libgal23 packages
right? Your new package will not be installing those names, will it?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
