Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 
>> > No. It'll belibgal2.4-dev and it provides libgal-2.4.{so,la}
>> > But source package name is just 'gal' then libgal-dev
>> > (it cames from same source name 'gal') will be removed.
>> >
>> > If you need old 0.x gal, you can pacakge it as gal0.x
>> 
>> So you're happy if I take the existing package, rename the packages,
>> and have it install exactly the same files?
>
> Yes. Don't forget to change section as 'oldlibs'

And explain why I should even need to rename the packages?  



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to