> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> >> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > No. It'll belibgal2.4-dev and it provides libgal-2.4.{so,la}
> >> >> > But source package name is just 'gal' then libgal-dev
> >> >> > (it cames from same source name 'gal') will be removed.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If you need old 0.x gal, you can pacakge it as gal0.x
> >> >>
> >> >> So you're happy if I take the existing package, rename the packages,
> >> >> and have it install exactly the same files?
> >> >
> >> > Yes. Don't forget to change section as 'oldlibs'
> >>
> >> And explain why I should even need to rename the packages?
> >
> > source 'gal' will be owned by gal version 2.4.
>
> Yes, but I could produce the same libgal-dev and libgal23 packages
> right? Your new package will not be installing those names, will it?
Right.
New gal pacakge provides libgal2.4-0 and libgal2.4-dev.
--
Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
