Le jeudi 27 mai 2010 à 11:46 -0700, Mark Hedges a écrit : > Possibly true, and your ire justified. However, in Debian, > it might not make sense to then block other applications > that are not native to macs. I don't think your preference > for one operating system (that is not Debian) should prevent > you from creating a system control panel that sets > preferences for other prior apps not from that system. > Since Debian is open to ports from other architectures, and > legacy terminal applications (alpine, in my case), I'm not > sure you can expect all the developers of those different > markets to conform to a minority market standard. It sounds > a lot like Microsoft... or a microsoft wannabe who resells > stuff that is already free.
WTF are you talking about? Do you think that Epiphany is a MacOS application or what? > I am just suggesting, since I am the only person who uses my > computer, it would be nice to have a checkbox to apply the > same choices to the system by running update-alternatives > with gksu. As an average user, I was confused why changing > the system preferences didn't change the system preferences. If you are the only person to use your computer, what shit do you give about system-wide defaults? If you want to do administrative tasks, you can use administration tools. Like update-alternatives, or gconf-editor if you want to change the same setting. Or sabayon even, if you want to use the gnome-control-center interface itself to set system-wide defaults. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “A handshake with whitnesses is the same `- as a signed contact.” -- Jörg Schilling -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
