On Thu, 27 May 2010, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Epiphany advertises itself just like Safari, so those > blocking it are also blocking macs. >
Possibly true, and your ire justified. However, in Debian, it might not make sense to then block other applications that are not native to macs. I don't think your preference for one operating system (that is not Debian) should prevent you from creating a system control panel that sets preferences for other prior apps not from that system. Since Debian is open to ports from other architectures, and legacy terminal applications (alpine, in my case), I'm not sure you can expect all the developers of those different markets to conform to a minority market standard. It sounds a lot like Microsoft... or a microsoft wannabe who resells stuff that is already free. I am just suggesting, since I am the only person who uses my computer, it would be nice to have a checkbox to apply the same choices to the system by running update-alternatives with gksu. As an average user, I was confused why changing the system preferences didn't change the system preferences. Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
