I do not think so. I would do it together with all other NMUs. Anton
Am Mi., 4. März 2026 um 19:52 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]>: > > Hi Anton > > On 2026-03-04 18:38:59 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > I want to drop that "provides" field completely to fix them all at once. > > Would it be OK? > > Have all reverse dependencies been updated yet? > > Cheers > > > > > Regards > > > > Anton > > > > Am Mi., 4. März 2026 um 15:22 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Ramacher > > <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > Hi Anton > > > > > > On 2026-03-04 07:43:09 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > Control: forwarded -1 > > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.90.html > > > > > > > > On 2026-02-23 20:33:39 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > > > Severity: normal > > > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] > > > > > Control: affects -1 + src:boost-defaults > > > > > User: [email protected] > > > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > > > > > Dear release team, > > > > > > > > > > I hereby request a transition slot for boost-defaults > > > > > to the newest boost1.90 package. > > > > > > > > Go ahead > > > > > > Please make sure that the Provides of libboost-system-dev is versioned > > > with (= ${binary:Version}) so that reverse dependencies having versioned > > > build dependencies on libboost-system-dev are satisfied. > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of the affected packages have already been identified, > > > > > and for builds that fail, bugs tagged boost1.90 were filed > > > > > this month. Some of these issues have already been fixed. > > > > > > > > > > https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=any&merged=ign&done=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=boost1.90&fusertaguser=debian-devel%40lists.debian.org&allbugs=1&sortby=id&sorto=asc&format=html#results > > > > > > > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[email protected];tag=boost1.90 > > > > > > > > > > Since Boost is one of the core C++ libraries and this transition > > > > > is required for many packages, I kindly ask you to provide > > > > > a transition slot even if not all bugs are fixed yet. > > > > > > > > > > This would allow us to increase the severity of the remaining > > > > > bugs and help speed up the transition. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > Anton > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ben file: > > > > > > > > > > title = "boost-defaults"; > > > > > is_affected = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8" | .depends ~ > > > > > "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; > > > > > is_good = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; > > > > > is_bad = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8"; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sebastian Ramacher > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sebastian Ramacher > > -- > Sebastian Ramacher
