Hi Sebastian,

I want to drop that "provides" field completely to fix them all at once.
Would it be OK?

Regards

Anton

Am Mi., 4. März 2026 um 15:22 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Ramacher
<[email protected]>:

>
> Hi Anton
>
> On 2026-03-04 07:43:09 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> > Control: forwarded -1 
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.90.html
> >
> > On 2026-02-23 20:33:39 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
> > > Control: affects -1 + src:boost-defaults
> > > User: [email protected]
> > > Usertags: transition
> > >
> > > Dear release team,
> > >
> > > I hereby request a transition slot for boost-defaults
> > > to the newest boost1.90 package.
> >
> > Go ahead
>
> Please make sure that the Provides of libboost-system-dev is versioned
> with (= ${binary:Version}) so that reverse dependencies having versioned
> build dependencies on libboost-system-dev are satisfied.
>
> Cheers
>
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > >
> > > Most of the affected packages have already been identified,
> > > and for builds that fail, bugs tagged boost1.90 were filed
> > > this month. Some of these issues have already been fixed.
> > >
> > > https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=any&merged=ign&done=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=boost1.90&fusertaguser=debian-devel%40lists.debian.org&allbugs=1&sortby=id&sorto=asc&format=html#results
> > >
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[email protected];tag=boost1.90
> > >
> > > Since Boost is one of the core C++ libraries and this transition
> > > is required for many packages, I kindly ask you to provide
> > > a transition slot even if not all bugs are fixed yet.
> > >
> > > This would allow us to increase the severity of the remaining
> > > bugs and help speed up the transition.
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > Anton
> > >
> > >
> > > Ben file:
> > >
> > > title = "boost-defaults";
> > > is_affected = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8" | .depends ~ 
> > > "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90";
> > > is_good = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90";
> > > is_bad = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8";
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Ramacher
> >
>
> --
> Sebastian Ramacher

Reply via email to