Hi Anton
On 2026-03-04 07:43:09 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.90.html
>
> On 2026-02-23 20:33:39 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
> > Control: affects -1 + src:boost-defaults
> > User: [email protected]
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Dear release team,
> >
> > I hereby request a transition slot for boost-defaults
> > to the newest boost1.90 package.
>
> Go ahead
Please make sure that the Provides of libboost-system-dev is versioned
with (= ${binary:Version}) so that reverse dependencies having versioned
build dependencies on libboost-system-dev are satisfied.
Cheers
>
> Cheers
>
> >
> > Most of the affected packages have already been identified,
> > and for builds that fail, bugs tagged boost1.90 were filed
> > this month. Some of these issues have already been fixed.
> >
> > https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=any&merged=ign&done=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=boost1.90&fusertaguser=debian-devel%40lists.debian.org&allbugs=1&sortby=id&sorto=asc&format=html#results
> >
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[email protected];tag=boost1.90
> >
> > Since Boost is one of the core C++ libraries and this transition
> > is required for many packages, I kindly ask you to provide
> > a transition slot even if not all bugs are fixed yet.
> >
> > This would allow us to increase the severity of the remaining
> > bugs and help speed up the transition.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Anton
> >
> >
> > Ben file:
> >
> > title = "boost-defaults";
> > is_affected = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8" | .depends ~
> > "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90";
> > is_good = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90";
> > is_bad = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8";
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Sebastian Ramacher
>
--
Sebastian Ramacher
