I believe there is a control field for autopkgtest for this purpose. gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:19:46 +0200, Chris Lamb wrote: > > > > - by disabling them, even if they fail gracefully, in order to follow > > > policy, we effectively castrate the tests, which doesn't seem right > > > from a QA POV. > > Mm, agreed. Moving these tests to the autopkgtest infrastructure is one > > fix but it's not "that" clean a solution.. > > Well, right, autopkgtest is the next question. If a test is forbidden > to leak to external parties the fact that it's being run during > build, the same is probably true by analogy for autopkgtests? > > (Recently I disabled the same tests for both build + autopkgtests.) > > > Cheers, > gregor > > -- > .''`. Homepage https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 > : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - https://www.debian.org/ > `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe > `- BOFH excuse #211: Lightning strikes. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
