On Tuesday 13 October 2015 12:28:22 Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Let's keep the ball rolling. Can you provide a comprehensive list of > features / bugfixes that should be included for a future release to be > worthy of an upload to unstable? > > Have all these been passed along to upstream? Which bugs are you > referring to for diff and blame views in this list [1]?
I already mentioned the following URL where I listed my concerns:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746923#c3
> Working on the full listing of blockers seem more constructive.
True. At least it can be helpful to avoid replacing bad with worse...
> That
> being said, should upstream disregard them, then a separate source
> package may be reconsidered in the future.
Everything is possible... :)
> What do you think?
I really hope we can cease wasting time on this discussion... I have too
little time for this due to other priorities...
It would be very nice and helpful if you could follow-up with upstream.
--
Best wishes,
Dmitry Smirnov.
---
It is no use saying, 'We are doing our best.' You have got to succeed
in doing what is necessary.
-- Winston Churchill
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
