On Monday 12 October 2015 09:53:00 Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > I won't open that can of worms again, much has been said on that subject > already on the GNOME-2 / MATE / GNOME-3 debate a few years back. > > Moving the discussion forward, I won't try to convince you to go a > different path.
Please keep in mind that Gitg is an effective development tool. I can't
understand why you are so impatient to sacrifice important and useful
features merely for UI consistency. My guess is that you probably use only
very basic features of Gitg and never stumbled upon deficiencies and pitfalls
of new release.
On one hand I shall be happy to hand over maintenance of Gitg-3 (and its
dependencies) but on the other hand I do not want to introduce yet another
package that does mostly the same but with new interface. New package is a
burden and justification for its introduction (pleasing GNOME fans?) is weak
especially considering that the package is already in "experimental".
Couldn't you just be little more patient and use package from "experimental"
in the mean time?
--
Best wishes,
Dmitry Smirnov.
---
Without doubt you are not sane.
-- Tage Danielsson
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
