tags 454778 + patch tags 676424 + patch thanks Hi,
Kevin Ryde wrote (04 Nov 2012 00:15:44 GMT) : > If there's a debian-startup.elc it will load instead of the .el > source of course. You're totally right, I had /usr/share/emacs24/site-lisp/debian-startup.elc in the directory of the .el symlink, but failed to see it due to editing the regular file (/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/debian-startup.el) instead of the symlink. >> Hence, I'm removing the "patch" tag. Of course, feel free to >> correct me if I misunderstood the intended effects of the patch. > It still works for me and has the desired effect. Confirmed, nice work. Adding the "patch" tag back. Sorry for the confusion. Rob, how about applying this patch to fix #454778 and #676424? (Please note that the latter is RC for Wheezy, that's why I landed here in the first place.) > But packages which mangle load-path themselves are unchanged. > If they put themselves at the front of the load-path they that's > where they stay. (A deliberate decision so as not to upset anything > which has to or had to force an order ...) Yes. This will be for other bug reports, I guess. Let's fix that one first. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
