tags 454778 - patch thanks Hi,
Kevin Ryde wrote (07 Dec 2007 19:50:07 GMT) : > Firing up "emacs -q" leaves a load-path with the various package > additions at the start, whereas I thought the idea of > debian-pkg-add-load-path-item was to have them after /usr/local. This was reported again as #676424. This is why #454778 came in my way. They should probably be merged. > I think debian-run-directories ends up forcibly moving any additions > made by the /etc/emacs/site-start.d files up to the front of the > load-path. > I get some joy from the change below to have debian-run-directories > merely remove the things it wanted temporarily in the load-path > (ie. /etc/emacs/site-start.d and /etc/flavour/site-start.d) and leave > anything else done by the site-start parts alone. This patch still applies, with minor offsets, to current debian-startup.el. However, "emacs -q" gives me the same load-path as a result, regardless of whether this patch is applied or not. Any idea what's happening? Hence, I'm removing the "patch" tag. Of course, feel free to correct me if I misunderstood the intended effects of the patch. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
