Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 13:41:18 +0000, a écrit : > Practically it would be an 'official Debian port', and we'd have all the > usual things like install media.
I wouldn't call it "official", but I agree on the rest. Getting hurt by sid bugs is always a pain, and you can not have users that way. And having a port in the normal infrastructure flow helps a *lot* to get maintainers at least try to fix their packages, instead of leaving all the tudy to the porter team. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141111135228.gg3...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr
