Peter Palfrader, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 13:39:02 +0100, a écrit : > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 12:05:06 +0000, a écrit : > > > Although, how is that handled for hurd-i386? I assume it has no > > > security support, there may be some unofficial packages used; are > > > therefore none of their machines DSA? > > > > We are still stuck in the "not released arch => no DSA machine => not > > released arch" loop. > > Except that it's not a loop. DSA has indicated time and time again that > if an arch qualifies for a release in all other aspects, we'd be running > buildds and porterboxes close to the release. And, TTBOMK, the release > team has so far accepted that. IOW the fact that hurd is not being > released with jessie is not due to not having d.o systems.
Ok, then I don't understand why there are "DSA-admined buildds" and "security buildds" columns in the release qualification sheet. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141111125413.gd3...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr
