tisdag den 7 juni 2011 klockan 21:31 skrev Guillem Jover detta: > On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 21:24:02 +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > > > > Yes, I can have a go at it. In passing by, I agree with Robert that > > the executables should be built from 'freebsd-utils'. That was the > > solution that Petr indicated to me at the time of importing the initial > > adaption into the Alioth project. > > Ah yes, had forgotten too that conversation, then let me merge it and > then feel free to update freebsd-utils copyright file, this way if > there's dupes it avoids adding them.
I have committed an incomplete survey to trunk/freebsd-quota/debian/copyright thus postponing the decision of a murge until I proceed further. This intermediary state can serve us as evolutionary documentation, if nothing else! The really cumbersome point is 'sbin/fsck_ffs/*' where 4-claused, 3-claused, and 2-claused BSD licensing is mixed on individual files, dependent on the contributing authors. At the moment I have detected all names with attributed copyright, but the finer points of splitting and text inclusion will be done step wise. Any advice on practice is most welcome. Also DEP-3 does have its drawbacks. Best regards, Mats -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110610001035.ga20...@mea.homelinux.org
