>>>>> "Erik" == Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Erik> Momchil Velikov wrote: >>>>>>> "Erik" == Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Erik> I know that ms doesn't distribute gnu utils >> FWIW, they do. GCC and GDB at least. Erik> just to clarify: at the same time, if debian is called >> debian Erik> gnu/linux system because debian developers decided that it should Erik> be called that then that's it, I don't object to that. >> Yes. What's wrong in _convincing_ others to do the similar thing ? >> Just like debian were convinvced ? Erik> same thing as convincing other to be/(not)use/(not)believe/etc XXX Erik> (where XXX is personal choice). specially in a zealous way (THAT's Erik> the RIGHT path) What's this ``same thing'' ? I fail to see anything wrong in the process of convincing anybody to anything. Erik> I thought I already explained it - everybody should be able to name Erik> the project whatever they please, without one or another author of Erik> used software demanding anything beyond GPL (talkig about GPL-ed Erik> software). Nobody argues with this. But you seem to think that somebody's right to name something invalidates my right to attempt to influence the naming decision. ~velco
