[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If we ever get a replacement libc that would really work as > replacement... on such system GNU claims would become much weaker. Not > that there was a serious chance of that happening - drop-in replacement > of glibc on Linux would be a lot of work and so far none of the > alternative libc projects had tried to pull that off.
Why would anyone want to replace GLIBC in the first place? To get rid of "GNU" in "GNU/Linux"?
