> How long have you used each? (I assume you've used gnash a lot since you > maintain it..) I've only tried each for a few hours myself, about once > per month since January, as I use websites with flash that neither > supports, but my general impression is that swfdec supports more sites, > including the previously mentioned google video.
I cannot talk about gnash, I tried it a long long time ago and it disappointed me a lot as almost nothing was working. I know that since then it has become much better. I know that developpers of gnash and swfdec talk a lot and share ideas and tests and things like that, both teams seem to be quite cooperative. What got my attention on swfdec was that it was the first on supporting youtube and most of all its zero crash policy. > I gather that gnome will be (or is already) including swfdec-gnome (not > swfdec-mozilla) as a standard component. > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/devel-announce-list/2008-January/msg00001.html For what I know version 2.22 comes with swfdec-gnome, that is why the version numbering of swfdec-gnome got changed to match gnome's and current is 2.22 also. Anyway... I really think that installing either of them (maybe a recommends with both as alternatives) would be a good solution. I'd say that swfdec is a better solution for that "need to click to view" feature, as it seems safer (security thinking) than displaying everything by default. Regards... -- Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
