* Matthias Murra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-21 17:17]: > It's certainly not lvm's fault if the installer screwed up a bit, so > yes, this bug probably can be closed -- or reassigned to the
So what exactly did the installer do? From what I can see, you created some LVM devices, but they were "inactive" so the installer didn't see them. I've no idea why they'd not be active right after creating them and I cannot reproduce this. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
