Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 18:18:53 -0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2004 20:10:51 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 16 13:10:50 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.70] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BPRyE-0006Ze-00; Sun, 16 May 2004 13:10:50 -0700 Received: from ufl.edu ([68.214.123.124]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 16 May 2004 16:10:19 -0400 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 16:09:33 -0400 From: "Mark Haidar (Fyren)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Debian Installation Report Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: Used http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040515/sarge-i386-netinst.iso at around midnight EST May 16th uname -a: Linux bob 2.6.5-1-386 #2 Fri Apr 30 20:13:30 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 1:00 AM EST May 16th Method: Booted off the above image, net installed with the following sources- deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main Machine: Once a Dell Dimension XPS D300, now mostly made of spare parts Processor: P2-300 Memory: 256 megs Root Device: IDE, IBM DHEA-38451 Root Size/partition table: Disk /dev/hda: 8455 MB, 8455200768 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1027 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 1 980 7871818+ 83 Linux /dev/hda2 981 1027 377527+ f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/hda5 981 1027 377496 82 Linux swap Partition 1 is / Output of lspci: 0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440LX/EX - 82443LX/EX Host bridge (rev 03) 0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440LX/EX - 82443LX/EX AGP bridge (rev 03) 0000:00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 01) 0000:00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01) 0000:00:07.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01) 0000:00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 01) 0000:00:0f.0 Multimedia audio controller: Aureal Semiconductor Vortex 2 (rev fe) 0000:00:10.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) 0000:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 RF/SG AGP Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked: [O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems: [O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system: [O] Install boot loader: [O] Reboot: [O] Comments/Problems: The install went very smoothly in general. Definitely better than the last time I installed Debian in 2001. The only question I was asked that I didn't feel was accompanied by adequate information was whether to install xdm or gdm. Only after doing some searching on the Net did I find it wasn't a big deal, but when an OS installer asks you a question you don't know anything about it can be disconcerting. --------------------------------------- Received: (at 249344-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 May 2004 21:19:49 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 29 14:19:49 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BUBF7-0000pB-00; Sat, 29 May 2004 14:19:49 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (ip46035.poa.virtua.com.br [200.213.46.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7E517ED0; Sat, 29 May 2004 21:19:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 090B66E0C2; Sat, 29 May 2004 18:18:53 -0300 (BRT) Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 18:18:53 -0300 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing fixed bugs Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9 --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Closing d-i bugs that were marked fixed. If the bug you reported is still a problem, please write back. --=20 see shy jo --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAuP49d8HHehbQuO8RAsl9AKCTGCrAKtnxh9Ki8OviyqIcan1UoQCffB6b j5zy+0V8TUMDq2DM6ZNBLkc= =IWET -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]