Perhaps I'm missing something here, but doesn't this mean that the default install with d-i is now "broken" by using both dhcp-client and resolvconf? Doesn't this affect everyone using dhcp?
Clearly if the default install leads to a non-functioning network it won't be getting rave reviews... I must be confused... Scott Webster On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 08:43:44AM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 05:23:06PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > > > On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 17:10, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > Because the debian-installer folks asked the dhcp*-client folks to leave > > > things as they are for sarge. > > > > So can & should debootstrap switch to installing dhcp3-client? > > I expect not, but ask debian-boot. > > In order for dhcp-client to be updated to v3, the various upgrade issues > (dhcp-* v2 -> dhcp-* v3, dhcp3-* -> dhcp-* v3) need to be worked out, and I > think it's a bit late in the game for that anyway. We asked about it some > time ago and were told to leave it alone for d-i's sake. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]