Quoting Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > No, PLEASE don't force translators to read yet another list. It wouldn't be > so difficult to CC: debian-l10n-* in the l10n messages or, even, CC: > debian-i18n? Since the d-i work is being done by many translation teams the > later might even be more reasonable.
Well, I wasn't particularly glad to ask translators follo -boot and, anyway, I can't force anyone to do anything...:-). Translation worked very well until them with a very informal structure so let's keep it informal, for sure. My preferences goes to a dedicated mailing list dor d-i l10n. I also thought about the other part of your suggestion (using -i18n). However I imagined that this could botther people using and reading -i18n for other purposes. The third choice is using a dedicated d-i-l10n mailing list. Your proposal for an alioth ML is interesting, indeed. However, when pinging translators individually, I felt some of them relectant to following another ML. Mostly, people wo don't want another ML are people who also participate in d-i "coding". Specialized translators are in favour of a dedicated ML. I, for myself, am a bit balanced....:-) BTW, Javi : will you go to debconf4? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
