Andrew Pollock wrote: > Can #229328 be addressed? I've submitted a patch. It would greatly improve > LVM support in the installation process, as it's rather broken at present.
I had been reluctant to commit that since I don't know enough about lvm to test it. -set -- `vgdisplay -v | grep 'NOT active' | wc -l` -[ $1 -gt 0 ] && apt-install lvm10 +#229328 #set -- `vgdisplay -v | grep 'NOT active' | wc -l` +#229328 #[ $1 -gt 0 ] && apt-install lvm10 +# I presume we're chrooted into the base installation here... +[ -e /proc/lvm/VGs ] && set -- `ls /proc/lvm/VGs/ | wc -l` && [ $1 -gt 0 ] && apt-install lvm10 That comment is very confusing, it says it expects to be chrooted to /target, and then proceeds to use apt-install, which is only available outside of /target. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
