On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:22:47AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 05:22:21PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > >> Well, if it isn't usable (remember, it's an udeb, so we're only talking in > >> the d-i context here) for hppa, hppa should not be in the list of > >> architectures for that package, IMO. > > OK. partitioner still needs to Depend on the particular udebs > > containing partitioning programs it uses. > > Why? If partitioner depends on "partitioning-program", and we make sure there > is only one of those (ie. one package providing partitioning-program) per > architecture, I do not see what the problem is.
Because it can't use just any partioning program, it uses a particular one (or, actually, a particular one, two, or three) depending on the architecture. If we depend on a virtual partitioning-program package, it could install parted-udeb only even though that doesn't work on that particular architecture. -- Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
