On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 05:22:21PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: >> Well, if it isn't usable (remember, it's an udeb, so we're only talking in >> the d-i context here) for hppa, hppa should not be in the list of >> architectures for that package, IMO. > OK. partitioner still needs to Depend on the particular udebs > containing partitioning programs it uses.
Why? If partitioner depends on "partitioning-program", and we make sure there is only one of those (ie. one package providing partitioning-program) per architecture, I do not see what the problem is. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
