On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:00:43 -0500 "Lennart Sorensen" <lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 07:01:58PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote: > > Why was Reiser3 phased out? It wasn't *grossly* unstable or > > anything, and despite lack of maintenance it was still a good > > little filesystem that could have stayed for longer. > > I had plenty of silent data corruptions with reiser 3.6 and will never > trust anything with that name on it with my data ever again. > > It was NOT a good filesystem and was that unstable. > My experience differed. I apologise.
