On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 07:01:58PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote: > Why was Reiser3 phased out? It wasn't *grossly* unstable or anything, > and despite lack of maintenance it was still a good little filesystem > that could have stayed for longer.
I had plenty of silent data corruptions with reiser 3.6 and will never trust anything with that name on it with my data ever again. It was NOT a good filesystem and was that unstable. -- Len Sorensen
