I think there could be two distinct sets of criteria: 1. criteria for the premier desktop to suit most users - it's counter-productive for portability to be a major factor in this 2. criteria for the next-best desktop where 1. isn't practical - portability, versatility and media size are much more important here
I think it is actually good to decide on a 2., so that we don't end up with needless inconsistency like: * mipsel suggesting MATE as default if it can't handle GNOME * LXDE being the default on the small CD images (for offline installs) * kfreebsd with XFCE as a default because it was for wheezy These are useful criteria for deciding what CD images we'd like, too. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
