On Wednesday 03 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote: > I agree that, in that case, things may be debated as this somewhat > "closes" things down in a case where there is no strong need. > > So, well, I'm ready to discuss about this again. After all, what we > need here is a placeholder and it's quite unlikely that people will > try to access the meeting logs directly by typing their URL (which > would be a good motivation to use d-i.d.o). > > > I also don't buy Otavio's argument that d-i.d.o is so much nicer. > > Especially something like the meeting logs is only accessed through > > links from the wiki or mails, so the URL does not make ANY difference > > for practical purposes. > > That fits my remark above, indeed.
As you seem to agree with my main argument that there is no need to lock away meeting logs I have moved them to alioth and adjusted the links on the Wiki page accordingly. This will allow any team member to chair a meeting and post logs. Please remove the meetings-logs directory on d-i.d.o (as obviously I could not do that myself). Cheers, FJP
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
