* Martin Michlmayr [Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:13:09 +0100]: > * Adeodato Simó <d...@net.com.org.es> [2008-11-06 15:47]: > > I think it's clear that the cruft tool should be patched not to propose > > removal of such source packages, but although ftpmaster is open to > > patches, somebody has to produce them. Because of this, I'm asking: is > > there a technical reason that mandates to have split source packages for > > linux-modules-di between arm and armel? Would it be appropriate to merge > > the two?
> I just talked to ftpmaster about this again to discsus a possible > workaround (adding a binary package to armel, but not to the arm > package). But they told me that they're aware of the problem and > don't run the cruft remover on linux-modules-di-arm until the bug in > the cruft tool is fixed. > So it seems we don't have to change the linux-modules-di package at > all. Ok, thanks for following-up to this, Martin. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org A hacker does for love what other would not do for money. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
