* Adeodato Simó <d...@net.com.org.es> [2008-11-06 15:47]: > I think it's clear that the cruft tool should be patched not to propose > removal of such source packages, but although ftpmaster is open to > patches, somebody has to produce them. Because of this, I'm asking: is > there a technical reason that mandates to have split source packages for > linux-modules-di between arm and armel? Would it be appropriate to merge > the two?
I just talked to ftpmaster about this again to discsus a possible workaround (adding a binary package to armel, but not to the arm package). But they told me that they're aware of the problem and don't run the cruft remover on linux-modules-di-arm until the bug in the cruft tool is fixed. So it seems we don't have to change the linux-modules-di package at all. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
