* Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-06 15:47]: > This happened because ftpmaster's tool that detects obsolete source > packages apparently doesn't cope well with different source packages > providing the same binary packages in different architectures, which is > the case between linux-modules-di-arm-2.6 and linux-modules-di-armel-2.6. > > I think it's clear that the cruft tool should be patched not to propose > removal of such source packages, but although ftpmaster is open to > patches, somebody has to produce them. Because of this, I'm asking: is > there a technical reason that mandates to have split source packages for > linux-modules-di between arm and armel? Would it be appropriate to merge > the two?
Just to let you know that I haven't forgotten about this yet. Mark Hymers and I discussed this problem last week and I believe we found a workaround (add a binary package to the armel but not the arm linux-modules-di packge so the two packages don't generate exactly the same binaries). I'm currently waiting for Mark to confirm before uploading a new linux-modules-di package. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
