On Saturday 19 July 2008, I wrote: > My current feeling is that that bit should be dropped from your current > patchset and that we should consider that question separately for both > RAID and LVM afterwards, and we should at least consider crypto as > well.
One thing that should be part of that change is to ensure underlying devices are "locked" as is done when they are created in partman, although I'm not entirely sure if we already do that for RAID or not.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
