Hi, On 14 Aug 2000 12:53:45 -0400 Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Akira YOSHIYAMA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > OK. Here is a patch for the latest CVS. > > Oh wow. Is this ready for seirous testing and inclusion in 2.2.17? > Have you tested it? Yes, of course. I've ported and tested b-f to NEC PC-9800 architecture for a long time ,and used termwrap from last month. It works fine. Best regards, Akira Yoshiyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.1... Adam Di Carlo
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.1... Taketoshi Sano
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.1... Adam Di Carlo
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.1... Taketoshi Sano
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.1... Akira YOSHIYAMA
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.1... Adam Di Carlo
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.1... Taketoshi Sano
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.1... Akira YOSHIYAMA
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.1... Adam Di Carlo
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.1... Adam Di Carlo
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.1... Akira YOSHIYAMA
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.1... Adam Di Carlo
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.1... Akira YOSHIYAMA
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15 Joey Hess
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15 Akira YOSHIYAMA
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15 Joey Hess
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15 Adam Di Carlo
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.1... Joey Hess
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.1... Adam Di Carlo
- Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15 Taketoshi Sano
- using addon pack for base (Re: not i18ned part in b-f... Taketoshi Sano