Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

[Adam Di Carlo]

Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Is there any way to i18n the forked (potato) debconf?
> 
> Yes of course. And I know from experience it means touching every file
> in the package, and writing at least 200 lines of code.

Oh well.  If we can have i18n versions of the rest, then we're mostly
there, anyhow.

Comprimising...

-- 
.....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]