Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

[Adam Di Carlo]

Akira YOSHIYAMA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Surely, we can do with basedisks.sh hacking. But, it makes the script
> more complex and dirty.

Are we talking about woody or potato?  If woody, then sure, lets find
a cleaner way to do it.  If woody, however, it doesn't matter all that
much since the system will be gutted very soon, and basedisks.sh will
cease to exist.

> If we have i18ned console tools, termwrap is a very good choice.
> It's better than every tool considers terminal emulator for users.
> 
> And then.... we can merge termwrap and sensible-x-terminal-emulator.
> It provides us more unified i18n terminal environment.

Quite.  But the woody vs potato argument comes up again.  I doubt such
a change can be made in potato X11 packages at this point.

-- 
.....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]