On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:15:07AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > > Thats all I did, as long as I remembered not to include the patch that
> > > > > should never be included... it breaks the whole build in really
> > > > > interesting
> > > >
> > > > Yes, the patch that must not be.
> > >
> > > Is that the patch that must not be named as well? Otherwise, maybe Geert
> > > could
> > > add an annotation like 'this is to break Debian kernel builds' so novices
> > > know
> > > what to expect :-)
> >
> > The one that will be called m68k-PRIVATE-m68k-changes.diff soon?
>
> The problem patch is 133-arch.diff because of the localversion thing I
> think.
Yep, that's the one I renamed (haven't synced with kernel.org yet).
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
