On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Thats all I did, as long as I remembered not to include the patch that
> > > should never be included... it breaks the whole build in really
> > > interesting
> >
> > Yes, the patch that must not be.
>
> Is that the patch that must not be named as well? Otherwise, maybe Geert could
> add an annotation like 'this is to break Debian kernel builds' so novices know
> what to expect :-)
The one that will be called m68k-PRIVATE-m68k-changes.diff soon?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
