On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:11:38PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Hi Stephen, > >>> atari-ethernec-fixes.diff (also add atari-ethernec-IRQF_SHARED.diff if >>> ethernec and ethernat are to be used in the same kernel). >> >> Those patches are *not* in -8 for sid. I guess I'll have to make >> another run at the patch queue. (Unless cts wakes back up or someone >> else wants to be kernel patch dude. Hint, Hint. ;) > > Counter-hint: I don't. I have strong misgivings about anything that involves > CVS or SVN access to kernel or d-i repositories (following -powerpc has
Getting your head around the build system is at least as much fun. > severely shattered my belief in Debian's conflict resolution procedures). That would pretty much do it. > Since I will have to act as kernel upstream for the forseeable future, I > prefer to keep out of Debian food-fights. > > Providing patches for inclusion in Debian kernels is as far as I'll go. I'll take that as a tentative no. ;) Still plenty of room for everyone else! Maybe someone wants a few more buildds? ;) >> We need to figure out the patches for experimental too. My last try >> totally failed to apply quite a few of the patches. > > We'll have to follow Geert's patch queue for development kernels, meaning > we need to swap out obsolete patches or add new ones in the right order. > I'll try to help with that. > > I'd like to have a more streamlined way of syncing Geert's patch queue - > can git or rsync be used for that, Geert? I'm getting it down to a repeatable art form, if not a science. Right now I just download everything from Geert's quilt file and rewrite it as a debian series file. Usually this works okay, but I have to remember to use the right set of patches for the right kernel. It's certainly not an elegant procedure. :) -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
