also sprach Maximiliano Curia <m...@gnuservers.com.ar> [2015-03-30 14:13 +0200]: > I wouldn't like to have a fixed time for non-video-recorded > events, nor promote them by requiring to have one of them each > day, nor demote them to second class events that occur while > people is eating.
I am really failing so see how this has anything to do with video. The official schedule has 90 Minutes for lunch during which I presume the video team members get to eat, along with the majority. Why does that have any bearing on whether lunch opens or closes a little earlier/later? > I have no opinion about the ad-hoc session, only that the current > schedule proposals only shows them in the afternoon. We're probably not going to actively prevent "ad-hoc" sessions in the morning either. What's the benefit of colouring specific times for "ad-hoc" events, rather than just declaring *all other times* than in the schedule to be available for ad-hoc meetings? Sure, we have to do room allocation somewhat, but other than that there remains a stark paradox in the idea of scheduling ad-hoc stuff. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
