On 16/10/14 20:42, Gunnar Wolf wrote: >> There has not been much discussion on this, so I guess most people >> thinks this is a good idea? > > I do. One of the issues that lead to not so much discussion here is > that the role of the DebConf committee has not been too clear, or has > been too limited. Assembling a Team of Elders just to help the vote > for the next venue decision is maybe too much.
Sorry I did not make that more clear. I was referring to the whole teams proposal in that comment. > Yes, of course, it's a hard decision, and one that has led in the past > to quite a bit of discussion and demotivation (mainly if we count the > demotivation of the teams that do not get picked, of course), but I > would surely want to have the Committee play a more active role > throughout the year. Now, regarding the committee, I personally agree that the committee could have a more active role. Maybe we can discuss what would be the best use for it. For example, helping bids prepare for the decision. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
