On 18 February 2014 12:36, Brian Gupta <brian.gu...@brandorr.com> wrote:
> I touched on this earlier, but please understand, that presenting more
> than one option seems like it would make the job of those making the
> decision much more difficult.
One option to simplify the process would be for all involved to simply
consider Munich and Heidelberg to be two independent bids with an
overlapping local team. That will make the choice a bit harder as we
would have one bid, but it would make each individual bid easier to
evaluate and compare.
This would also meant the the choice of the preferred German venue
would be removed from the local team, unless they withdraw one of the
options before the final decision meeting.
--
Best regards,
Aigars Mahinovs mailto:aigar...@debian.org
#--------------------------------------------------------------#
| .''`. Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org) |
| : :' : Latvian Open Source Assoc. (http://www.laka.lv) |
| `. `' Linux Administration and Free Software Consulting |
| `- (http://www.aiteki.com) |
#--------------------------------------------------------------#
_______________________________________________
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
