Gaudenz Steinlin <gaud...@debian.org> writes: > [Ganneff: Could you please add a munin graph with the answers to the com_accom > question or provide the numbers by email, Thanks] > > Moray Allan <mo...@sermisy.org> writes: > >> We are now (by tomorrow) at the end of the period for applying for >> sponsorship, so the next set of decisions about room utilisation etc. >> should be made soon. >> >> How many people have registered for what room categories currently, and >> how does that compare to the available rooms? How many sponsored people >> said they would/wouldn't take "communal" accommodation? > > The room categories are visible in this munin graph [1]. Additional data > about the "Debian role" is available in the admin interface. > > Current status: > All / accompany / interested / None / not > selected > Own accomodation: 26 / 0 / 10 / 3 / 0 > Sponsored accomodation: 121 / 0 / 5 / 0 / 0 > self-paid communal: 16 / 0 / 3 / 1 / 1 > self-paid camping: 13 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 > (+ 20 requesting sponsored accomodation and > prefering camping) > self-paid 8 bed: 27 / 1 / 3 / 1 / 0 > self-paid 2 bed: 27 / 0 / 2 / 0 / 1 > > Not taking into account any additional requirements this means we have > enough rooms for all these requests. > >> >> We should clarify soon for people already registered what kind of room >> they can expect to receive, and, e.g. give them the chance to pay for a >> better room if they aren't happy with that one. > > I think we should as soon as possible confirm the rooms for those that > choose a self-paid room. For the upgrades we have first to find a more > or less consensual way of doing this. As a discussion basis for this we > need to know the answers for the survey questions. AFAICS these are > currently not accessible in a munin graph or in the admin interface. As > it looks now, we still have beds available in each category.
I just got read access to the penta DB and tried to retrive the data about the communal accomodation survey [1]: 95 would accept communal accomodation 17 would *not* accept I'll try to produce more detailed statistics tomorrow. Gaudenz [1] I used the following SQL query, wich if I understood the DB layout right should only include those that requested sponsored accomodation (accom_id=22) and plan to attend DC13 (attend=true and conference_id=7) select attend, person.person_id, person.public_name, conference_id, com_accom from debconf.dc_conference_person join person on debconf.dc_conference_person.person_id = person.person_id where conference_id=7 and attend=true and com_accom=false and accom_id=22; > > A meeting to discuss how to proceed is scheduled for tomorrow 1800 UTC > in #debconf-team. Unfortunately this meeting was not announced on-list > yet it's just mentioned in the IRC topic. IIRC the plan was to announce > it with a reply to the last meeting's minutes, but this never happened. > > Gaudenz > >> >> (That doesn't necessarily mean cheaper "upgrades" beyond the current >> pricing, as some team members suggested, but we should start to clarify >> things beyond the very vague options most people selected so far.) >> > > Gaudenz > > [1] > http://munin.debconf.org/debconf.org/skinner.debconf.org-penta_accomodation.html > >> -- >> Moray >> _______________________________________________ >> Debconf-team mailing list >> Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org >> http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team > > -- > Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. > Try again. Fail again. Fail better. > ~ Samuel Beckett ~ > _______________________________________________ > Debconf-team mailing list > Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org > http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
